Investing
The End of The Beginning: Global Economy
Written by
Posted on June 01, 2026
Thinking
Related articles

Investing
What might investors learn from THAT photo?
Whatever you feel about Trump, whatever your stand, grant Trump one of the great gangsta moves of American political history.
But I don't want to discuss Trump, per se, nor how close the United States came to a disaster.
I want to discuss the photographer behind the image, Evan Vucci, & what investors can learn from him.
It was his past experiences that had prepared him for this moment. As he has since told multiple news outlets:
'It wasn't the first time I was in that situation. So I was able to keep my head, I was able to think. I was able to compose pictures. I think all of us were there and we just stayed in the moment, stayed on the story. In my head, I just kept saying to myself, "slow down, slow down. Compose, compose"'.
Most of all:
'I started thinking, OK, what’s going to happen next? Where is he going to go? Where do I need to be? Where do I need to stand? What is going to happen? The job is all about anticipation'.
And so is ours.
As I often remind my clients, and they in turn remind me the primary challenge for investors in a confused, noisy, too often hyperventilating world is to remain calm, focussed, confident, energised, knowledgeable, anticipatory and always in control.
Not enough time to read, not enough time to think probably means you’re too often on the backfoot.
And if you are too often on the backfoot, you’re probably going to underperform.
My job has always been to help time constrained investors narrow the range of uncertainty for investment decisions that must be made: then, where necessary, and where appropriate, tell them what to do.
It was and remains a Sisyphean task of constant reading, learning, consultation, collaboration, questioning, re-testing and confirmation..
..a never ending effort to be less wrong.
And anytime I am tempted to think I have rolled that Sisyphean stone to the top of the hill of understanding, it rolls back down again.
As you try to process, try to understand recent events channel Evan Vucci: he remained calm, focussed, confident, energised, knowledgeable, anticipatory and always in control.
And a result, he captured an image for the ages.
Be like Evan.
JA
Written by James Aitken
June 01, 2026
Investing
Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face
'Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face', is one of Mike Tyson’s most famous quotes, however it is not the full quote.
The next sentence , 'Then, like a rat, they stop in fear and freeze' often gets left out.
I guess the investing equivalent would be 'everybody likes to reference Warren Buffett, until a Warren Buffett moment arrives'.
99% of good investing is doing nothing, the 1% is how you behave when things are crazy.
For now, there is no Trump put and neither is there a Fed put which is why there is an Austrian aroma – of creative destruction - to markets.
When there’s not been any for a while, price discovery hurts.
Singapore PM Lawrence Wong’s short video to citizens explained how we, too should be thinking about this moment ‘with clear eyes’.
Yet since Wednesday, all sorts of financial market celebrities have been begging Trump to pivot or texting The Treasury Secretary furiously: it may be dawning on these financial market celebrities that for the first time in twenty or thirty years, it’s not about them.
Last week the leveraged momentum voting machine had a head on collision with Benjamin Graham’s weighing machine.
It may be a while before the former emerges from the repair shop. For patient capital, that is fine.
For impatient capital, not so much because as experienced as he is, Bessent is not going to save you.
Clean things up eventually, sure; but he is not going to save you.
Markets have put too much faith in Bessent’s ability to influence a man (Trump) whose sole influencer is himself.
We could do what so many others are posting or writing about: predict (gamble) when Trump might be forced to pivot.
I don’t think that is a wise strategy.
Better: pencil in 0% real US GDP in both of Q2 and Q3 2025 then ask what’s then the organic clearing price for the S&P500 and US credit? In the absence of a pivot which I do not think is imminent, lower and much wider remain the answer.
There has been no hint of a Trump pivot this weekend, so the vol-adjusted reduction in positions, and the churn, will continue.
What do we do?
Be like the 1%.
Not that 1% - the leveraged beta shills who confused brains with a bull market.
No, be like the 1% of market participants who are calm, confident, energised, focussed, knowledgeable, anticipatory and always in control.
And you know what they are doing this morning?
They have been net liquidity providers, placing valuation-driven bids for specific assets well below market - and getting filled.
To be clear: these are not bets on Trump's reaction function. Nor are they bets on uncertainty been resolved across weeks of difficult tariff negotiations, and perhaps two quarters of economic weakness.
They expect no quick validation of their investment thesis, but feel the entry level for these specific assets affords a margin of safety, and thus higher expected returns.
JA
Written by JA
June 01, 2026

Investing
What Was That All About? Global Macro Investing
“Global investors just do not have the time or inclination or background to understand the nuances of the BOJ communication”, opined one sell-side scribe during the last two weeks of tumult.
Shame on us.
Cynicism aside, if we invert that scribe’s logic we get this:
“Global investors who make the time, and have both the inclination and background to understand the nuances of BOJ communication, have an edge”.
As I have long discussed with my clients, the primary challenge for investors in this noisy, too often hyperventilating ('emergency rate cuts now!'', 'it's all the BoJ's fault!') world is to remain calm, confident, energised, focused, knowledgeable, anticipatory, and always in control.
It is easier said than done, and the last three weeks have been a stern test of that mindset.
The other challenge is -at the risk of being prosaic - the hurdle to macro bullshit has never been lower.
Never.
On market structure, as Alan Greenspan told a futures industry gathering in Boca Raton in March 1999:
'Probability distributions estimated largely, or exclusively, over cycles excluding periods of panic will underestimate the probability of extreme price movements because they fail to capture a secondary peak at the extreme negative tail that reflects the probability of occurrence of a panic.
Furthermore, joint distributions estimated over panicless periods will underestimate the degree of correlation between asset re-turns during panics when fear and disengagement by investors results in simultaneous declines (or, in rare instances, increases) in values as investors no longer adequately differentiate among degrees of risk and liquidity.
Consequently, the benefits of portfolio diversification will tend to be significantly overestimated by current models’.
Indeed, and recent market turbulence has been another reminder of that.
The determination to add risk after the big wobble has been astonishing to watch: it’s almost as if the wobble in everything from the Nikkei to momentum stocks never happened.
Could this rebound be driven by qualitative, fundamental investors?
Bargain hunters aside, I doubt it.
The best explanation I have heard for this remarkable snap back is ‘the computers want their stocks back.’
Last Thursday (August 8th) I found a moment to do an interview with Grant & Bill.
We discussed a range of relevant topics, including how the path to the BoJ hike (& BoJ hikes to come) started with a dinner in London last October.
I hope you may find time this weekend to listen: https://www.grant-williams.com/contributor-james-aitken/
Be well, invest well, see you later.
JA
Written by James Aitken
June 01, 2026

Investing
The Millennium Bridge as a metaphor for Trump (and what it means for hedging policy)
In the January 15th, 2010 edition of Notes from a Small Island I used London’s Millennium Bridge to help my investor clients visualise the obvious, growing (de)fault lines within EMU.
The Millennium Bridge was opened by Her Late Majesty The Queen on June 10th, 2000, and it was soon apparent there was a problem with the bridge’s engineering.
Arup - the engineers - conducted a programme of research: this research indicated that the swaying of the new bridge was generated by the sideways loads pedestrians generated when walking.
Chance correlation of our footsteps when we walk in a crowd generated slight sideways movements of the bridge. It then became more comfortable for people to walk in synchronisation with the bridge movement.
This instinctive behaviour ensures the sideways forces we exert match the resonant frequency of the bridge and are timed to increase with the motion of the bridge.
As the magnitude of the motion increases, the total sideways forces increases and we become more correlated: Arup named this process synchronous lateral excitation.
Arup’s research programme showed the effect is sudden, not gradual.
It does not show as small movements with a few people, gradually building up as people are added.
Instead, it takes a critical number of people for a bridge to sway - to succumb to synchronous lateral excitation.
Until that critical number is reached, there is no evidence of the effect.
So what?
Trump is the personification of synchronous lateral excitation: he is a multi-dimensional gamma agent, and he’s just getting started.
Happily, some investors were well prepared for this; many, it seems, are not.
The essence of modern financial markets is the assumption that realised volatility and realised, cross-asset correlation are forecastable, predictable, and generally low and stable.
On the back of that assumption enormous, high-velocity, heretofore immensely successful risk engines and portfolios have been built: but what happens when the largest driver of markets (e.g. tariffs, defence spending) becomes something that most market participants have no experience of?
To state what should now be obvious: of course, US stocks are lower and credit spreads are a bit wider - but there is no sign of panic. Nobody is tripping over themselves to own wings or tail options in US equities.
Nor are they falling over themselves to buy credit protection, although - this ought be obvious too - the inability of the dollar to bounce during this turbulence is causing a lot of large pools of global capital to examine their FX hedging policy.
The absence of panic in markets tells us the working assumption is that realised volatility and cross-asset regimes will remain predictably low and stable.
Perhaps they will remain so: however, no matter what the administration claims, I have been reminding my clients for a while now that consumption taxes, such as tariffs, either reduce real income through inflation (which is the exact opposite of what Trump seems to want for American workers) - or reduce corporate profits via higher inputs costs.
Amidst all the bravado (c.f. Lutnick on everything), the essence of MAGA is a transfer of real income from white collar and professional workers to blue collar workers.
For society, a good thing.
For US corporate profits, not so much.
Somewhat higher realised volatility and somewhat higher higher cross-asset correlations aside, I wonder whether the reason US equity markets are struggling is because we are slowly reverting from a momentum-driven voting machine to an earnings driven weighing machine?
Some would argue the slow reversion to Graham’s weighing machine is overdue: it is not the end of the world, but for the unprepared investor, it may feel like it.
Our primary objective during this transition is unchanged: to remain calm, confident, energised, focussed, knowledgeable, anticipatory and always in control.
JA
Mapping reality since 1992. Advising the world’s most powerful pools of capital since 1999. Discover why they trust him: https://www.aitkenadvisors.com/contact
Written by JA
June 01, 2026