Investing

If forty million people say a foolish thing..

Written by JA

Posted on June 01, 2026

'If forty million people say a foolish thing, it does not become a wise one, but the wise man is foolish to give them the lie'.
So wrote Somerset Maugham in one of his notebooks.
The phrase is often attributed to Anatole France, or abridged to 'if forty million people say a silly thing, it's still a silly thing'.
Whenever I read 'dollar' and 'safe haven' in a sentence, Maugham's phrase comes to mind.
Think about it.
Was the dollar's surge in 2008 (apprehended to some extent by Fed-sponsored dollar swap lines) due to the dollar's perceived 'safe haven' status?
Of course not.
During the darkest days of 2007 and 2008, nobody would have described the sponsor (U.S.) of the subprime (self-) immolation as a 'safe haven'.
I simplify, but only a little: the massive demand for dollars in 2008 arose because many foreigners held US paper (bonds, RMBS, etc.) funded in dollars, or fully FX-hedged - and hence, they needed to source dollars fast to either repair balance sheets, or adjust their FX hedges (lower).
They struggled to do so.
This is something my late friend, Niall Coffey, summarised neatly in October 2009: https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues/ci15-6.html
Related, perhaps overlooked point: do we really think the largest dollar exposures are voluntary?
In my experience, the world's reserve managers have long viewed their dollar exposure as a liquidity buffer; but have never thought of it as a 'safe haven' per se.
Surplus countries have to swallow deficit countries' liabilities if they wish to continue to run a surplus with them.
And the bigger the surpluses are, the harder it is for them to diversify into other similarly-sized liquidity buffers: I too like gold, but what would happen to the gold price if SAFE (or any large holder) needed to liquefy some of their gold holdings?
The screens tell us a new dollar bear market is underway.
It kicked off the day The White House dropped this:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/america-first-investment-policy/
But this endless, pointless chatter about the dollar losing its 'safe haven' status makes me wary.
To repeat, surplus countries have to swallow deficit countries' liabilities if they wish to continue to run a surplus with them.
There is still no scale liquid alternative to US capital markets.
Markets and the commentariat seem to be focussed on the asset side of foreign exposure to dollar assets.
I am surprised by how little conversation there is about the dollar liabilities held by foreigners: a reduction in foreign holdings of dollar assets can (c.f. 2008) create increased structural demand for short-dated dollars to service those dollar liabilities.
I, too have been and remain a dollar bear.
However, the more narrowly-focussed the conversation (all about dollar assets, little about dollar liabilities), the more widespread the inane conversation about 'safe haven' status the more open minded I want to be about the dollar.
If forty million people say a silly thing, it is still a silly thing.
I'll leave you with some Keynes.
Abridged Keynes:
When the facts change, I change my mind
Actual Keynes:
The inactive investor who takes up an obstinate attitude about his holdings and refuses to change his opinion merely because facts and circumstances have changed is the one who in the long run comes to grievous loss
JA
Mapping reality since 1992. Advising the world's most powerful pools of capital since 1999. Discover why they trust him: https://www.aitkenadvisors.com/contact

Dollar

Related articles

What might investors learn from THAT photo?

Investing

What might investors learn from THAT photo?

Whatever you feel about Trump, whatever your stand, grant Trump one of the great gangsta moves of American political history.

But I don't want to discuss Trump, per se, nor how close the United States came to a disaster.

I want to discuss the photographer behind the image, Evan Vucci, & what investors can learn from him.

It was his past experiences that had prepared him for this moment. As he has since told multiple news outlets:

'It wasn't the first time I was in that situation. So I was able to keep my head, I was able to think. I was able to compose pictures. I think all of us were there and we just stayed in the moment, stayed on the story. In my head, I just kept saying to myself, "slow down, slow down. Compose, compose"'.

Most of all:

'I started thinking, OK, what’s going to happen next? Where is he going to go? Where do I need to be? Where do I need to stand? What is going to happen? The job is all about anticipation'.

And so is ours.

As I often remind my clients, and they in turn remind me the primary challenge for investors in a confused, noisy, too often hyperventilating world is to remain calm, focussed, confident, energised, knowledgeable, anticipatory and always in control.

Not enough time to read, not enough time to think probably means you’re too often on the backfoot.

And if you are too often on the backfoot, you’re probably going to underperform.

My job has always been to help time constrained investors narrow the range of uncertainty for investment decisions that must be made: then, where necessary, and where appropriate, tell them what to do.

It was and remains a Sisyphean task of constant reading, learning, consultation, collaboration, questioning, re-testing and confirmation..

..a never ending effort to be less wrong.

And anytime I am tempted to think I have rolled that Sisyphean stone to the top of the hill of understanding, it rolls back down again.

As you try to process, try to understand recent events channel Evan Vucci: he remained calm, focussed, confident, energised, knowledgeable, anticipatory and always in control.

And a result, he captured an image for the ages.

Be like Evan.

JA


Written by James Aitken

June 01, 2026

Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face

Investing

Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face

'Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face', is one of Mike Tyson’s most famous quotes, however it is not the full quote.

The next sentence , 'Then, like a rat, they stop in fear and freeze' often gets left out.

I guess the investing equivalent would be 'everybody likes to reference Warren Buffett, until a Warren Buffett moment arrives'.

99% of good investing is doing nothing, the 1% is how you behave when things are crazy.

For now, there is no Trump put and neither is there a Fed put which is why there is an Austrian aroma – of creative destruction - to markets.

When there’s not been any for a while, price discovery hurts.

Singapore PM Lawrence Wong’s short video to citizens explained how we, too should be thinking about this moment ‘with clear eyes’.

Yet since Wednesday, all sorts of financial market celebrities have been begging Trump to pivot or texting The Treasury Secretary furiously: it may be dawning on these financial market celebrities that for the first time in twenty or thirty years, it’s not about them.

Last week the leveraged momentum voting machine had a head on collision with Benjamin Graham’s weighing machine.

It may be a while before the former emerges from the repair shop. For patient capital, that is fine.

For impatient capital, not so much because as experienced as he is, Bessent is not going to save you.

Clean things up eventually, sure; but he is not going to save you.

Markets have put too much faith in Bessent’s ability to influence a man (Trump) whose sole influencer is himself.

We could do what so many others are posting or writing about: predict (gamble) when Trump might be forced to pivot.

I don’t think that is a wise strategy.

Better: pencil in 0% real US GDP in both of Q2 and Q3 2025 then ask what’s then the organic clearing price for the S&P500 and US credit? In the absence of a pivot which I do not think is imminent, lower and much wider remain the answer.

There has been no hint of a Trump pivot this weekend, so the vol-adjusted reduction in positions, and the churn, will continue.

What do we do?

Be like the 1%.

Not that 1% - the leveraged beta shills who confused brains with a bull market.

No, be like the 1% of market participants who are calm, confident, energised, focussed, knowledgeable, anticipatory and always in control.

And you know what they are doing this morning?

They have been net liquidity providers, placing valuation-driven bids for specific assets well below market - and getting filled.

To be clear: these are not bets on Trump's reaction function. Nor are they bets on uncertainty been resolved across weeks of difficult tariff negotiations, and perhaps two quarters of economic weakness.

They expect no quick validation of their investment thesis, but feel the entry level for these specific assets affords a margin of safety, and thus higher expected returns.

JA


Written by JA

June 01, 2026

The Millennium Bridge as a metaphor for Trump (and what it means for hedging policy)

Investing

The Millennium Bridge as a metaphor for Trump (and what it means for hedging policy)

In the January 15th, 2010 edition of Notes from a Small Island I used London’s Millennium Bridge to help my investor clients visualise the obvious, growing (de)fault lines within EMU.

The Millennium Bridge was opened by Her Late Majesty The Queen on June 10th, 2000, and it was soon apparent there was a problem with the bridge’s engineering.

Arup - the engineers - conducted a programme of research: this research indicated that the swaying of the new bridge was generated by the sideways loads pedestrians generated when walking.

Chance correlation of our footsteps when we walk in a crowd generated slight sideways movements of the bridge. It then became more comfortable for people to walk in synchronisation with the bridge movement.

This instinctive behaviour ensures the sideways forces we exert match the resonant frequency of the bridge and are timed to increase with the motion of the bridge.

As the magnitude of the motion increases, the total sideways forces increases and we become more correlated: Arup named this process synchronous lateral excitation.

Arup’s research programme showed the effect is sudden, not gradual.

It does not show as small movements with a few people, gradually building up as people are added.

Instead, it takes a critical number of people for a bridge to sway - to succumb to synchronous lateral excitation.

Until that critical number is reached, there is no evidence of the effect.

So what?

Trump is the personification of synchronous lateral excitation: he is a multi-dimensional gamma agent, and he’s just getting started.

Happily, some investors were well prepared for this; many, it seems, are not.

The essence of modern financial markets is the assumption that realised volatility and realised, cross-asset correlation are forecastable, predictable, and generally low and stable.

On the back of that assumption enormous, high-velocity, heretofore immensely successful risk engines and portfolios have been built: but what happens when the largest driver of markets (e.g. tariffs, defence spending) becomes something that most market participants have no experience of?

To state what should now be obvious: of course, US stocks are lower and credit spreads are a bit wider - but there is no sign of panic. Nobody is tripping over themselves to own wings or tail options in US equities.

Nor are they falling over themselves to buy credit protection, although - this ought be obvious too - the inability of the dollar to bounce during this turbulence is causing a lot of large pools of global capital to examine their FX hedging policy.

The absence of panic in markets tells us the working assumption is that realised volatility and cross-asset regimes will remain predictably low and stable.

Perhaps they will remain so: however, no matter what the administration claims, I have been reminding my clients for a while now that consumption taxes, such as tariffs, either reduce real income through inflation (which is the exact opposite of what Trump seems to want for American workers) - or reduce corporate profits via higher inputs costs.

Amidst all the bravado (c.f. Lutnick on everything), the essence of MAGA is a transfer of real income from white collar and professional workers to blue collar workers.

For society, a good thing.

For US corporate profits, not so much.

Somewhat higher realised volatility and somewhat higher higher cross-asset correlations aside, I wonder whether the reason US equity markets are struggling is because we are slowly reverting from a momentum-driven voting machine to an earnings driven weighing machine?

Some would argue the slow reversion to Graham’s weighing machine is overdue: it is not the end of the world, but for the unprepared investor, it may feel like it.

Our primary objective during this transition is unchanged: to remain calm, confident, energised, focussed, knowledgeable, anticipatory and always in control.

JA

Mapping reality since 1992. Advising the world’s most powerful pools of capital since 1999. Discover why they trust him: https://www.aitkenadvisors.com/contact


Written by JA

June 01, 2026

The End of The Beginning: Global Economy

Investing

The End of The Beginning: Global Economy

What a privilege it was to watch Rory win: after the last month, I wonder whether that wonderful photo is a metaphor for how we all feel?

Mental exhaustion, combined with relief that we've muddled through.

Said Ben Bernanke in May 2022: ‘I think monetary policy is 98% talk and 2% action, and communication is a big part’.

Trump’s tariff delivery process has flipped that: it’s 90% action, with a minimum 10% flat tariff on cross talk.

Given the proposed reordering of the global trading system, the proposed reordering of global capital flows, and the imperative of not losing the bond market one would think sticking to a tight tariff script would be paramount - if only there were one.

Unlike the Fed, Trump has no dot plot.

And for markets that have been spoon fed (Fed) for twenty odd years, it is a tough transition to thinking for ourselves.

Yet this - thinking for ourselves - is the way it always used to be.

You bought assets on their merit, not based upon anticipated policy, and only with a considerable margin of safety because that ensured higher expected returns.

I am fully on board with more Main Street, less Wall Street and for that matter getting foreign partners to pay for their own defence.

I am fully on board with a less financialised economy, one in which via the mechanics of a lower US trade deficit must mean less recycling of global surpluses into dollar assets.

Starting in 2017, Xi sought to deleverage his economy (housing, property) to make his economy fit for purpose.

This oft repeated by Bessent ‘Wall Street will be fine, we are focussed on Main Street’ poses a challenge: is this a deliberate effort to de-financialise the US economy?

If Xi’s multi-year deleveraging of his economy is the proxy – then what the Trump administration is attempting isn’t going to be an overnight thing.

Nor, given the hyper-financialised nature of the US financial system, will it be easy.

Whilst the narrative surrounding last week’s treasury debacle is wildly inaccurate, I have never understood the net cumulative benefits to society offered by the casino culture of 0DTE, 2x and 3x levered ETFs and 2x and 3x levered single stocks ETF, and all sorts of trading platforms that make it as easy as possible for retail punters to play.

But how do you soft land a hyper-financialised economy in which US household net worth is approximately 8x personal disposable income?

And moreover, how to you soft land a bond market in which foreign capital underwrites approximately 30% of gross issuance, whilst simultaneously making it clear to all lenders you want your currency lower?

Last’s weeks important treasury auctions went well, but there’s still another $2 trillion plus to refinance in 2025.

Musk is now guiding FY 2026 DOGE savings lower – what was $1 trillion is now $150 billion - and who knows how much tariff revenue might be raised, because as of now it is impossible to model.

The consistent message large global pools of capital are hearing from Washington is

a) please sell our currency and

b) (I paraphrase) go away.

A jog or even a run from dollar assets?

No.

For a decade the world has been kind of 'auto-enrolled' in an overweight, unhedged US equity overweight.

The default global equity overweight for U.K. defined contribution pensions, for European private banks and wealth managers, and for Asian private banks: US equities.

Let's be clear: it worked.

But so great is the global savings overweight in dollar assets that even a tip toe out of the global dollar overweight can lead to disruptive market conditions.

It is time to use your imagination.

We are in a global competition for capital, one in which for ideological reasons the managers of the world’s reserve currency would like us to take our money home.

It will be a bumpy ride for us all, but in a global competition for capital, surplus countries – with large pools of domestic savings – are probably better off.

I am often asked ‘how is Europe going to fund the purchases of the ever increasing amount of bunds and joint-EU-bonds they are going to issue?

The answer is staring us in the face: they will fund it out of the S&P500.

There are two recent Podcasts of mine in the public domain, to which you may wish to listen: with Grant Williams; and then another hosted by Ted Seides with the brilliant Louis-Vincent Gave and Marko Papic.

If this phase transition or regime shift - whatever it is, it is different - feels uncomfortable, don't worry, you're not alone.

I tip my hat to every one of my clients who, with great discipline and fortitude, deployed capital last Monday and last Tuesday.

We all want to be Warren Buffett, don’t we: until a Warren Buffett moment arrives.

Be like the 1%.

Not that 1% - the leveraged beta shills who confused brains with a bull market and are making total fools of themselves on this platform and elsewhere.

No, be like the 1% of market participants who are calm, confident, energised, focussed, knowledgeable, anticipatory and always in control.

And you know what that 1% (whom I've advised for twenty five years) were doing last Monday and Tuesday?

Operating as net liquidity providers, placing valuation-driven bids for specific assets well below market - and getting filled.

To be clear: these are not bets on Trump's reaction function.

Nor are they bets on uncertainty been resolved across weeks of difficult tariff negotiations, and perhaps two quarters of economic weakness.

And they are not bets on pivots, either.

If you are buying assets on their merits (intrinsic valuation - how very quaint), you can be a successful investor without being a perpetual forecaster.

In fact, one of the most liberating experiences for an investor is to be asked 'what's you're forecast of X?'

And to reply 'I don't have one'.

Let's be inspired by a great man's words, for I think they apply today:

Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.

If you want to be part of that 1%..

..until then, as ever, my aim is to be less wrong.

Mapping reality since 1992. Advising the world's most powerful pools of capital since 1999. Discover why the trust him: https://www.aitkenadvisors.com/contact


Written by

June 01, 2026